Worsley tracks the people and art that populated the courts of George I and II of England. She has a very easy to read style, but cites well and was able to draw upon a good number of first-person sources. That said, there were three things I distinctly disliked about this book.
One, Worsley has a completely unearned appreciation for George II and his wife Caroline. Both of them seem to have been thoroughly unpleasant in several arenas, not least their treatment of their immediate family. The abuse, lack of support, and outright hatred shown by each of them toward their children soured me on both of them. In vain were Worsley's repeated reminders that Caroline was bffs with philosophers, or her assertion that George II's lack of reaction to Prince Frederick's death was due to "rigid royal training" (how then to explain his inattention to the funeral? Or for that matter, where was his "rigid royal training" during the ~70 years of George II throwing tantrums and exploding into feuds at the slightest instigation?).
Two, the politics, laws and wars of the age get hardly a mention. Surely actual events were just as important to understanding the Georgian court as knowing that the royal mistresses' rooms were damp?
And three, truly hideous line drawings interrupt the text to illustrate various personages. Not only do these drawings make everyone look like lumpy potatoes, but they also bear no resemblance whatsoever to their subjects' other portraits. What use ARE they? A poor choice, and an unnecessary one, given the good range and number of color paintings included.